\left( x ........................................+................................................................................+................................................................................................................................................................+................................................................................+.............................................................y \right)
Ok wrapping it shorter made it work.
I was under the impression that shouldnt matter as I can wrap long lines with align.
Now I know and that settle this problem.
Thanks
Playing with this I managed to use & to wrap arbitrary length lines, but alignment is out.
Here on my system it compiles, but does not compile on the LaTeX site.
I will post it and just give a screenshot what I get.
If I can get this to align, then I have a better solution as I can work with arbitrary lengths.
I basically just extended the align & into split.
Here is the code, but it wont display here on LaTeX .org.
Here s how it compiles on my system, and it is darn close to what I want except for the large alignment offset. You know how I can fix that, as this will be a great method.
Never mid, I fixed it !
I just had to align the x at the top with &x
It now works just great with arbitrary long lines !!!
Couldnt have done it without your help.
Very much appreciated.!!
Here is the final code and how it displays and wraps absolutely great on my system without the line length constraint that split seem to have.
Weird but wonderful.
I do seem to lose the final bracket but that is a different issue I should be able to hunt down.
Using another thread where you helped me, I managed to fix the missing bracket at the end at y above by adding \right. and \left. inside the numerator bracket like this
Probably bad practices I follow, but it works like a charm on long lines to wrap.